Blatantly Obvious.

Atrios brings up:

After telling a bunch of different stories about why they fired the U.S. Attorneys, the Bush Administration is not entitled to the benefit of the doubt. Congress and the American people deserve a straight answer. If Karl Rove plans to tell the truth, he has nothing to fear from being under oath like any other witness.

This is correct. The only reason to refuse to be under oath or even have a transcript is because you plan to lie and you want to do it with impunity.

I find this vastly amusing considering how the right was acting when the warrant-less wiretapping was first uncovered. They were saying, "If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear."

Hmm. Exactly. If Rove has nothing to hide from congres.... HAHAHAHA.

I can't even type it without laughing.